AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Iowa gambling task psychopy12/28/2022 ![]() ![]() !(index_files/figure-html/correlate behavioural 2019-1.png) # Behavioural variables correlate with each other (a bit more) !(index_files/figure-html/correlations plots 2019-1.png) # Survey variables correlate with each other (as before) # Descriptives (behavioural variables) - 2019 sample # Descriptives (survey variables) - 2019 sample **Iowa Gambling Task (Decision-making)** **AQ-50** (Autism spectrum characteristics) **Shift work** did NOT affect **sleep quality** or **depression** (but underpowered)īackground-image: url("images/Farm2.png") **Alcohol use** did NOT moderate the relationship between **anxiety** and **sleep quality** **Chronotype** (morningness-eveningness) did NOT predict performance on **task switching** (and neither did sleep quality) **Autism spectrum characteristics** predicted **finger tapping** performance, and interacted with **age** (stronger association in younger participants) - Alycia Messing's talk yesterday **Sleep quality** did NOT predict performance on the **PVT** (after controlling for age and gender) **Dream recall** significantly predicted **working memory performance** on the N-back working memory task (after controlling for age and gender), but sleep quality did not !(index_files/figure-html/correlate behavioural and survey-1.png) # Survey measures are poor predictors of behaviour !(index_files/figure-html/correlate behavioural-1.png) # Behavioural variables correlate with each other (a bit) !(index_files/figure-html/correlations plots-1.png) # Survey variables correlate with each other Stratified by whether subjects completed behavioural tasks This year: thinking of using Prolific Academic and paying participants (better quality?)īackground-image: url("images/River.png") Platforms/sources used: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Reddit, workplace emails, first-year Psychology pool (last resort) Having a large group helped (each student was supposed to recruit at least 50 participants) Students who had special populations (shift workers, computer gamers, etc.) struggled to gain enough power Probably about the same pace as in-person recruitment Recruitment was not as easy as you'd think PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory) MEQ (Morningness-eveningness Questionnaire) AQ-10 (Autism spectrum characteristics) Relatively good timing due to everything running on Inquisit Player 2019: lower dropout (warned them better?) We lost a lot of participants at this point #Iowa gambling task psychopy downloadInquisit requires participants to download a program #Iowa gambling task psychopy codeCan link through to Inquisit with hyperlink, taking ID code with it Qualtrics is better for surveys (complex skip logic etc.) # What we chose (2018-2019) - Qualtrics & Inquisit Designed for online behavioural data collection # Online data collection tools considered Are autism spectrum characteristics related to motor control in the general population? Is "chronotype" related to executive function? Do people with higher visual working memory remember their dreams more? Overall theme: Sleep, Memory and Attention Plan: Combine survey data with online behavioural experiments Catch - all data collection had to be online Allowed for the possibility of collecting more data than I'd ever had in one place! I worked with group projects from 2018-2020ĥ-10 students per group - group data collection, individual questions background-image: url(img/PurpleSky.jpg) a custom `title-slide` class that removes the slide number from the title slide Class: title-slide, center, middle, inverse ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |